When I was growing up, attending church two or three times a week and saying daily prayers was a way of life I never questioned. Nor did I question my religious beliefs or God-image. God and Jesus sat on thrones in a heavenly mansion and if I was a good Christian (like them) I’d get to go live with them when I died and so would every other good Christian and that was that.
Otherwise, God was as psychologically separate from the rest of my life as he was physically separate from the world. Nobody in my family took psychology seriously. How I felt inside or interacted with others had nothing to do with the most important things — you know, wearing the right persona, pleasing my family, not offending others. It never occurred to me that often meant pretending. If it had, I wouldn’t have seen that as a problem. It was just what you did.
Then at the age of 17, I was reading the assigned Bible verses at church camp one morning when suddenly I understood what they meant. It was as if a door had opened to a fascinating, entirely unexpected dimension of life. My heart responded with powerful feelings of awe and wonder. With my Christian training, I believed I been touched by the Holy Spirit. Joseph Campbell called an experience like this “… a profoundly felt, inward knowledge of the transpersonal imperatives and quality of life…” At that moment, the Bible, the symbol which triggered my new inward knowledge, became precious, and from then on its words spoke directly to me.
Jungian analyst Janet O. Dallett writes: “‘Archetype’ is Jung’s word for the psychological image of a god, and when an archetype is activated, we speak of its impact as numinous. In other words, numinosity is the charge of energy in whatever we experience as divine or demonic. If you want to know what is numinous to you, consider what you find fascinating, compelling, thrilling, mysterious, horrifying, gripping, tremendous, terrifying, dreadful, or awesome. Think about the things with which you are preoccupied in spite of yourself.” Sure enough, the archetype of the Self had been activated and I became preoccupied with the God-image of my religion.
But over the years a few more numinous experiences, each more powerful than the last, redirected my attention from the sacred without to the sacred within. Dallett writes, “The religious part of the psyche is at work whenever you pay attention to something that is numinous to you, whether or not other people feel it is important.” These experiences felt profoundly important and I knew they came from inside me, but even among my few acquaintances who had experienced similar things, no one thought of them in psychological terms. Indeed, one of the most respected and charismatic people in my church often disparaged humanism and psychology because they were “the wisdom of man” as opposed to “the wisdom of God,” by which he meant the Bible, which, of course, is also a product of the human psyche.
Why do we punish ourselves by rejecting the comfort of the Beloved unless it comes in the guise of our religions and is sanctioned by their authorities? Are we humans really so disgusting that not even a God of love can love the authentic souls beyond our beliefs and beneath our masks?
We are spiritual beings because we are psychological creatures, not in spite of it. Our psyches are imprinted with the sacred. Psychology and religion are twins with the same origin and destination. Isn’t it time they stopped sparring and got down to the business of loving?











